Wednesday, September 2, 2020

Video games good or bad Essay Example for Free

Computer games positive or negative Essay Are Video Games Good For You, by Steven Berlin Johnson a writer and essayist of various magazine articles. Johnson has blended the scholarly community and guardians the same by affirming that computer games have a spot in training. Johnsons sees on computer games are so out of the standard a great many people excused his declarations absent a lot of thought. His thoughts appeared to discover footing however when he composed his book regarding the matter supporting a questionable view point computer games are beneficial for you. Johnson makes a straightforward case that computer games can be gainful. Is it conceivable the greatest distracter of youngsters and undergrads in America, could really be benefiting a few? There are various investigations on computer game play and the measure of time individuals spend on them, particularly our childhood. Numerous past examinations don't reflect Johnsons see point. Things being what they are, are computer games instructive, or simply one more interruption to conventional training and guardians? Johnson contends that computer games not just pull in kids through sex and viciousness. He asserts individuals are attracted to the structure and feeling of experience. Johnson battles that specific pieces of the cerebrum are invigorated that really cause you to ache for success. Johnson asserts that computer games are so muddled, loaded up with critical thinking and practical situations that they should accomplish something positive. He attests that TV has a portion of indistinguishable attributes from computer games. The most spoiled types of mass redirection computer games and fierce TV dramatizations and adolescent sitcoms end up being nourishing all things considered, Johnson composes. They offer an inexorably thorough subjective exercise. Whats more, the psychological abilities they sharpen are similarly as significant as the ones practiced by perusing books.(pp. 381-394 ). Johnson proceeds all through his article to expose logical information regarding the matter, however it doesn't persuade this author computer games are beneficial for you. Johnson doesn't assume all the fault on that information in light of the fact that there extremely isnt much accessible regarding the matter. Johnson attempts to take freedom with IQ scores on the ascent throughout the most recent couple of years however that is a stretch in his endeavor connect it to video game play. Johnson disregards any information that contentions with his position, for example, better training strategies or more access to data using the web. Asking further in the region of study, there is by all accounts a considerable amount of information that Johnson doesnt notice in his article. Studies uncover that there is a lot of mischief brought about by broadened computer game play. Connections have been made to forceful conduct and even physical fights to video game play. Guardians have only objections about computer games. Most guardians need their kids to play the customary way, outside. Guardians likewise make some hard memories getting youngsters to do whatever else when a computer game dominates. Johnson himself moves in an opposite direction from his own contention when he offers expressions like dont quit understanding books or don't rely upon computer games for your whole instruction. Johnson has made me investigate the possibility that computer games are something beyond an interruption, yet at long last they are not most ideal approach to teach our youngsters they are an interruption. References Johnson, S. (2012) Why Games Are Good For You, From Inquiry to Academic Writing, pp. 481-494ñž

Saturday, August 22, 2020

English Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 4

English - Essay Example An engineer must be constant with his crowd and his capacity to compose will no doubt guarantee that he can give valuable reference material to the individuals who are seeing his work. There are sure crowds or purchasers who require an architect’s perseverance so as to build up an enthusiasm for the structure and a composed portrayal would go far in guaranteeing the improvement of this intrigue. It is in this manner significant that the designer keeps up their composing aptitudes at their level best so when the event emerges, they might have the option to communicate their plans to their crowd with practically zero extra assistance other than the composed materials they may have given. It is, in this manner, a reality that modelers need to give a valiant effort to guarantee that they have built up their composing abilities to such a degree to having the option to effectively portray their structures. Along these lines, by growing great composing aptitudes, the draftsman will h ave the option to envision the inquiries that his crowd is probably going to ask in the wake of making an introduction, and will have the option to respond to these inquiries adequately. It is in this way a reality that an engineer who is additionally a decent author will be increasingly effective in their work. Besides, draftsmen will have the option to desert insights about their structures that will be concentrated by people in the future of engineering understudies. Along these lines, the draftsmen with great composing abilities, deserting their attempts to be examined, will guarantee that this work will keep on impacting crafted by future modelers for a long time into the future. Update Paper Censorship is one of the significant issues of worry of the 21st century and this is on the grounds that the headway of innovation has prompted a ton of advancement in the media, diversion just as the correspondence areas. In this way, the oversight demonstration has been embraced all incl usive as it includes in the constitution of pretty much every country on the planet. It keeps individuals from uncovering materials that are ethically viewed as unreasonable just as touchy to watchers. Oversight is the obliteration of dangerous, shocking or troubling data from arriving at the general population. In certain nations, restriction is viewed as a method of meddling with the residents' entitlement to free discourse. This is a result of the rights to majority rules system just as the media’s right to freedom; along these lines, the media, people's discussions, movies and music among others can be controlled. From my own point of view, control has been deciphered as a method of keeping indispensable data from arriving at the general population. In a perfect world, the bodies offering control to books, movies, and music, radios or TV programs and creative articulation guarantee that the data they believe is unsuitable to the individuals from the general population and compromises the social financial and political request of the state has been modified. Explicit bodies like the administration, strict body or even private gatherings are skilled to force restriction on fine arts, film, music, and TV and radio projects among others. Different types of restriction exist in particular, deterrent which is done before distributing the

Friday, August 21, 2020

Blood :: essays papers

Blood Brackets of blood Dramatizations are characterized into four sub-fields: catastrophes, comedies, melo-shows, and parodies. Each sub-field has attributes, which makes it recognizable. It isn't unexpected to discover any blend of the sub-fields inside a play. To characterize dramatization one must gander at the more noticeable subject. This paper is concentrating on the show â€Å"Parentheses of blood†, by writer Sony Labou Tansi. Tansi was conceived in Congo in 1947. Of his fifteen plays most were distributed in French. In 1986 his work was charged for English interpretation. Tansi has survived Africas time of imperialism and the dictorial governments that followed. Congo was under French pilgrim rule through his immature years. It experienced times of military fascism before democratization. Tansi was an individual from the contradicting party in Congo and won himself a seat in the National get together in 1993, only two years before his demise. In the same way as other others in post-pioneer Africa, Tansi felt mistreated and untrusting of government, this is plainly clear in â€Å"Parentheses of blood.† This play is an African Drama. Three-dimensional characters are normal in African dramatizations, this is essential so as to make the show reasonable. Another subject of African plays is the nearness of a storteller. This is basic in light of the fact that numerous plays have been gone down through ages by word. A third distinctive element is a group of people that includes a functioning job inside the play. A last recognizing source is the nearness of routine. The characters in Tansi’s play were obviously three-dimensional. They all had unmistakable characters and body, a basic for making the dramatization authentic. In what capacity can the nonattendance of the three residual components of African dramatization be clarified? Tansi’s work was done in the post-provincial period. In view of French impact African routine turned out to be less conspicuous. It was not completely cleared out, but since of French strategy numerous once normal innate tunes and move turned out to be less basic among Africans. Writing in a cutting edge period Tansi had no requirement for a narrator. This play is a portrayal of the way Tansi saw life in Africa from his own perspective. Tansi didn't decide to have a functioning crowd. Not every single African dramatization had this trademark, yet this could be another result of the progress to the post-current writing of Africa.

Thursday, May 28, 2020

U.S. Military Veteran Suicide in Relation to Prevention Efforts Via the 22-a-Day Movement - Free Essay Example

The U.S. military involvement in foreign conflicts, specifically in the Middle East, since the 9/11 attacks, has been riddled with controversies ranging from the true validity of information justifying troop deployment in Iraq, the effects thereafter on international relations, to the mismanagement of funds garnered by the Department of Defense (DOD). It has not been until most recently, within the past five years, that that the human death toll on military personnel has gained much media attention. As Harrell Berglass (2011) touch upon, the death toll has been further amplified by family members sharing stories of losing loved ones to suicide, and various headlines with attention grabbing titles that point out the mental instability of troops. The loss of life both in military conflict and in civilian settings in the U.S. holds true to the fact that military suicide has and will continue to be a serious issue stemming from the unique levels of stress associated with combat (pp. 13-18). A journal released by Wong (2012) outlines that the 22-a-Day movement aims to raise awareness regarding veteran suicide so that family members of loved ones may be able to recognize the signs and provide the proper help necessary to prevent suicide (pp. 20-21). This essay will critique the misguided execution of the 22-a-Day movement by first examining the morality of the movement through politics and human rights. Second, this essay will analyze the veteran suicide statistics in the U.S. since 2013 to compare with the success of the 22-a-Day movement since its emergence into the mainstream media. Third, this essay will critique the proclaimed success of the 22-a-Day movement through the analysis of scholarly texts in relation to U.S. military veteran suicide rates and the strategies and tactics used by the 22-a-Day movement. The Main Issue: Military Suicide In an online journal released by Harrell Berglass (2011) emphasize that from 2005 to 2010, service members took their own lives at a rate of approximately one every 36 hours. While only 1% of total population has served in the most recent wars (in Iraq and Afghanistan), the veterans of those conflicts represent a total of 20% of death by suicide rates in the country (p.58). According to the Associated Press statistics, in the first 155 days of this year (2018), there were 154 suicides, which is an 18% increase from last year (2017). Furthermore, these statistics exclude veteran suicides, which are estimated to be at a rate of 22 per day, Wong (2012, pg. 23). According to Wood (2011), who is a a senior military advisor and correspondent for the Huffington Post, after 10 years of war, the demand for courage is shifting off the battlefields and coming home (p. 18). Wood (2011) also stated that as troop withdrawals continue, the after-shocks that reverberate from a decade of combat are being felt here, among wounded veterans and their families, (p. 20). The rate of military personnel returning home who have been severely wounded is unprecedented despite the incredible medical advances.

Saturday, May 16, 2020

Racism And Slavery During The 19th Century - 2451 Words

Racism is not just restricted to slavery and blacks, racism can be applied to anyone, and in 19th century England this was a huge problem. The 19th century was a trying time for those who were concerned with the abolition of slavery, those who were opposed to it were greatly concerned about losing their wealth or just concerned with the principle of a lower race being free. However those who were opposed to slavery were sick of seeing other humans being treated so poorly and saw it as inhuman. This is a crucial point in history, in the early 19th century no one knew how this was going to end, if slavery would be abolished or not. With this in mind the abolition of slavery was on the center stage in England from 1800 to 1833, this would be an issue until slavery was abolished. Not everyone would be happy with this going away, and resistance started to pile up but in the end it was a futile slavery was abolished in 1833. This was met with a lot of resistance in the outer colonies of the British Empire, these colonies wanted to keep their slaves so that they always had access to free labor. Slaves that heard about the abolition of slavery in these colonies tended to rise up against their owners, this usually ended in bloodshed for the colonies. However once this ended former slaves still had trouble getting jobs and finding work, with competition from other cultures for work was high so this didn’t help their cause. What it boiled down to in the end was racism, thisShow MoreRelatedThe Effect Of Slavery During The 19th Century1446 Words   |  6 PagesThe Effect of Slavery Plato, a great philosopher, once stated, â€Å"Dictatorship naturally arises out of democracy, and the most aggravated form of tyranny and slavery out of the most extreme liberty.† During the 19th century in America, extreme liberty was exactly what the South had. The South was characterized by slavery not just because Southerners owned slaves, but because slavery directly affected the way of Southern life. Unfortunately, by enforcing the slaveholding liberties of white SouthernersRead MoreSlavery In The River Of Dark Dreams By Walter Johnson1745 Words   |  7 Pagesslavery and the enslaved to achieve cotton’s global domination and earn the South’s economic title as the â€Å"Cotton Kingdom.† A major factor in the South’s economic rise was the expansion of slavery. During the first half of the 19th century, America began to acquire new territory. In â€Å"The River of Dark Dreams† by Walter Johnson, Johnson explains that with these new states, arguments about whether slavery should continue or be abolished altogether became more and more contentious. Given the SouthernRead MoreAfrican American Vernacular1239 Words   |  5 Pageshistory, the evolution of vernacular is very important and a very unique part of the culture. The African American vernacular has aided the development of a distinct culture in terms of what African Americans were subjected to from the installation of slavery. The African American vernacular was used as a way to expose the atrocities that African Americans were imperiled to through songs and language. â€Å"Go down Moses ,† a spiritual and â€Å"Strange Fruit,† performed by Billie Holiday are two songs that representRe ad MoreRacism During The 19th Century1461 Words   |  6 PagesDuring the 19th century, racism was an established and widely accepted ideology throughout the Antebellum South. Both Frederick Law Olmsted and John C. Calhoun portray typical racist ideology during the 19th century in Antebellum South. In his travelogue of the South, â€Å"A Journey in the Seaboard Slave States; With Remarks on Their Economy†, Olmsted advocated for the free soil movement. On the other hand, Calhoun advocated for slavery in his 1837 speech, â€Å"The ‘Positive Good’ of Slavery† before theRead MoreRacism : A History? Essay922 Words   |  4 Pages RACISM: A HISTORY Name Course Date Abstract This essay will focus on the film Racism: a History. I picked the film over the other films offered, because it taught me many things about history of the Black Americans. It illustrates how race continues to justify economic misuse and injustices. It shows how people moved from their maternal land, bound in slavery, and killed. This happens when people view others as though they are not human beings. This film helpsRead MoreRelationship Between Race and Capitalism Essay1358 Words   |  6 Pagesagainst the exploiter. Racism is primarily rooted in the historical development of capitalist as a world system. This has been proven through several centuries to be a flexible and useful method for the possessing classes. Racism justified genocide and conquest, on which established the European colonial empires. Racism rationalized the slave trade, which spurred the primitive accumulation of capital needed for the industrial revolution. The existence of racism may be explained in three waysRead MoreEssay Analyzing PuddNhead Wilson881 Words   |  4 PagesSpinthourakis Due: 9/7/12 APUS/Mr. Donovan Pudd’nhead Wilson Essay In literature, slavery and the African American race are often analyzed and interpreted by numerous authors. Mark Twain reveals numerous hitches and aspects of society’s view towards different races throughout many of his novels. In Pudd’nhead Wilson Twain describes theRead MoreEssay On How Have We Fail1123 Words   |  5 PagesAmerica. But throughout history, America has suffered from racism, injustice, exploitation of labor and gender inequality, and is still suffering from such issues to some extent. Events like the establishment of Jim Crow system, thousands of labor strikes throughout the 19th and 20th century and the long struggle of women to earn equal rights only remind us of our failure. The belief that â€Å"all men are created equal† may have ended slavery in 1865 but it had not established a nation truly equal toRead MoreMajor Themes Of Us History During Slavery Essay1607 Words   |  7 Pages Major Themes of US History During Slavery During creation, God made man and gave him the free will to do and act according to as he pleases as long as it is in agreement with His teachings. Fellow human beings could not have control over their fellow men because it was against God’s will. A state whereby one person has absolute power over another and controls his life, liberty, and fortune is known as slavery. The history of slavery dates back to creation times where the Israelites were taken asRead MoreU.s. Constitution, Discrimination865 Words   |  4 Pageshelped spell out individual rights and freedoms.Although the signing of the U.S. Constitution solved many problems it failed to solve the problem of discrimination against African Americans,women and gays and along with that the ongoing issue of Slavery. Discrimination was still a problem after the signing of the constitution in 1787. Until then certain minority groups were extremely segregated in places like; restaurants, hotels,and movie theaters.Peaceful sit-ins by students happened in about 100

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

The Conflict Of God And Empire - 1408 Words

God and Empire is ultimately about the Roman Empire and its relationship with/to the early church. I believe that Crossan’s key idea or â€Å"thesis† is that civilization naturally promotes developing an empire and violence, but the bible, regardless of the many violent acts inside of it, is encouraging use to choose a life of nonviolence. Civilization currently exists on the intrinsic belief that violence is normal, which is a principle that was obviously held in early Rome. In fact, it is this imperialistic ideology and belief in violence that gives the emperor his power. Oddly enough, it makes him seen as both a divinity and a peacemaker. In the society of the Roman Empire, peace built on the value of victory and therefore it comes with the forced acceptance of injustice, because always, in order for one to win, the other must lose. Crossan also explains that although civilization tends to normalize violence, it is possible that violence is not our ultimate destiny. He shows that both possibilities; violence and nonviolence, are present in the bible, often side by side. Crossan would like us to realize that the choice between the violence and none violence is ours to make. He shows that there is proof of this choice in both the Old and New Testament. Moreover, the Bible, he says, â€Å"is about the ambiguity of divine justice† (p. 94). Crossan’s analysis really begins with chapter 2. In this chapter he digs into the debate in The Old Testament surrounding the principles of justiceShow MoreRelatedThe Egyptian, Assyrian, And Persian Empires1580 Words   |  7 PagesFrom 1567 to 330 B.C. humanity experienced many subsequent development as well as decline in its civilizations. Among these events emerged three colossal empires that had shaken the world and forever changed the course of human history. The Egyptian, Assyrian, and Persian Empires have been instrumental in influencing technology, religion, and ideas throughout the world. Various factors have contributed to the success and downfall of these giants. Each of the â€Å"World Powers† have similarities as wellRead MoreHistory And Advances Of The Christian Church Essay1003 Words   |  5 Pagesthe course of Foundations of Reflection: God, my mission is to appreciate and learn the history and advances of the Christian Church. As students, we analyze cultural texts and describe meaningful events to develop an answer to â€Å"who,† â€Å"what,† and â€Å"why† there is a transcendent God. This composition will focus the historical-social context, ecclesial context, and modifications to the Church that occurred from three critical events; Fall of the Roman Empire, World War II, and the Celebration of theRead MoreChristianity And Islam : The World s Largest Religions1501 Words   |  7 Pagesreligions teach that â€Å"there is One true and only God, the righteous and transcendent Creator of all things in heaven and earth† (34). Both religions have foundational texts, Christianity has the bible and Islam has the Quaran. Although among their similarities the two religions differ in many ways. In this essay I will focus on the two religions origins and geographical locations, key people who fostered the religion, who they appealed to and their empires. Much like we all were born on a day we callRead MoreHow Did The Construction Of The Angkor State Lead A Collapse?1040 Words   |  5 Pagesfrom Java, marking the beginning of the Angkor period. With strong political, religious, and economic power, the Khmer empire established a territory including Cambodia, parts of southern Vietnam, and much of Thailand. Angkor, the capitol city of the Khmer empire, came to be a complex and prosperous metropolis that supported a very large population. Eventually, the Khmer Empire came to a cultural demise midway through the fifteenth century. The unifying culture came to an end, and many of the factorsRead MoreThe Economic Activity Of The Early Roman State1616 Words   |  7 Pageswere the power house, and they continually made policy and governed. The Roman Senate also seemed like an advisory council, because of the job and role they played. 5) The flaws in the Roman Republic the Conflict of Orders highlighted was the inequalities found in Roman society, which led to conflict between the elite and the rest of the population in Rome. The elite were called the patricians, while the majority of the population was called the plebeians, and plebeians rebelled against the patriciansRead MoreIslam, The Ottoman And Safavid Empire1528 Words   |  7 PagesIslam, the Ottoman and Safavid Empire Every empire that has ever been created constantly evolves. They will grow or they will diminish. Many empires cease to exist and some even start over under a different name. Throughout history, faith and religion have been at the core of almost every successful empire. There are a lot of factors that play into their faith. Two of the greatest empires to ever exist were the Ottoman and Safavid Empire. The Ottoman Empire was so large that it spanned from the IranianRead MoreThe Role Of Cities And The Countryside Play During Rome s Empire1649 Words   |  7 PagesIn chapter 4, Carter first describes how large the Roman empire was, explaining that the territory ranged from England, across Europe to the Middle East, and even into northern Africa (44). He goes further to describe the vast territory by stating the fact that 60 to 70 million people lived within the empire, with 5-7% living in the cities (44). Carter stated these facts so that the reader would have a better gauge for how la rge the empire was when he begins to explain his purpose of the chapterRead MoreThucydides And Thucydides History And Warfare1645 Words   |  7 Pagesexplanations of the origins of conflict. Herodotus focuses on recalling the origins of the Ionian Revolt, the rise of the Persian Empire, and the Persian Wars with Greece, while Thucydides writes about the Peloponnesian War. M.I. Finely suggests, in the introduction of Thucydides’ book that Thucydides is complementing Herodotus by beginning where Herodotus left off (Finley, History of the Peloponnesian War p.16). Although these two historians approach the start of conflicts in different ways, it seemsRead MoreGreek and Roman civilizations1262 Words   |  6 Pagesmany great empires, but none have made a greater impact than the Greek and Roman empires. These empires began as small city-states, and grew to become the powerful empires we know today. The Greek and Roman empires were not always enemies, considering the Romans were greatly influenced by the Greek culture. The two civilizations shared many similarities, but had different opinions on government operations. There are three different periods that span the history of the Greek and Roman empires; the HellenicRead MoreIslamic Religion And The Islamic World959 Words   |  4 PagesAs the Islamic religion rose, both the Persian, and Eastern Roman Empire began to collapse. In the seventh and eighth century, the rise of Islamic religion began to quickly move to rule the territories, taking over to create what is now a very important change in Islamic history. The rise of Islam began in the Arabian desert, showing great change for Islam as a religion, as well as the nature of the Islamic empire, but eventually this great rise began to collapse. The events that took place, is considered

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Why we dropped the Atomic Bomb Essay Example For Students

Why we dropped the Atomic Bomb Essay The dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August of 1945 was a definite turning point in the Pacific War of World War II. Earlier that year, Germany had been defeated and the world then turned its attention to the Pacific war. Most history books state the argument that the dropping of the atomic bombs on Japan was necessary to stop the war in order to save thousands of lives of American troops that were planning to invade Japan. Had the bombs not been employed (so the wisdom goes), an enormous number of American troops would have perished in an inevitable amphibious operation against the Japanese mainland.(McManus 1) This paper will demonstrate that Japan was willing to surrender before the bombs were used, and there were other hidden reasons for using the bombs. If you ask a high school graduate what the result of the atomic bombs on Japan was, he or she would most certainly answer the immediate surrender of all Japanese forces. That should be satisfactory enough to not question the issue any further. If you ask the same student wether the Japanese would have surrendered without the bombs, he or she will hesitate and will probably not be able to give an answer. The reason for this is that the history text books at school teach students a black and white fact: the atomic bombs were the only way to make the Japanese surrender. According to Francis E. Kazemek: most texts focus on abstract facts and figures, offering little discussion of the reality of the bombing.(Kazemek 2)The atomic bomb should not be considered as the only decisive factor for the Japanese surrender, but as the straw that broke the camels back. After the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Japanese empire continued to expand rapidly during the first half of 1942. Its empire extended from Manchuria and the Aleutian Islands to the north, New Guinea to the south, Burma to the west and the Marshall Islands to the east. Nevertheless, the tide turned against Japan when Germany was defeate d in May 1945 and the Americans took over the Marian Islands in 1944.(Long 1) The Americans needed the Marian Islands as an air base to be able to bomb Japan directly. Winston Churchill wrote in his personal narrative of the Second World War, The time at last had come to strike at the enemys homeland.(Churchill 540) Before then, Japan had virtually been untouched by any allied bombings because there had been no air bases close enough or an aircraft that could withstand flying nonstop for miles. The B-29, an aircraft designed to fly long distances without refueling, began to systematically bomb Japan. It was the B-29 that flew the atomic bombs to Japan. This aircraft took the war home to Japan.(Garvey 45)The B-29 firebombings on Tokyo and the effective blockade of supplies for Japan by the American submarines weakened the Japanese empire. Meanwhile, the Americans troops and back home were fed the idea that the Japanese would never surrender and the war would go on forever. But in fac t, the Japanese had sent peace feelers to the West as early as 1942, only six months after the December 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor. More would come in a flood long before the fateful use of the atomic bombs.(McManus 1) Even before the bombing of Pearl Harbor, the Japanese were divided into two groups. The peace party included the Emperor Hirohito and officers in the navy. The war party, headed by Army leader Tojo, included fanatical military members, believed that Japans empire should cover all the islands of the pacific and were responsible for the attack on the navy base in Pearl Harbor.(McManus) On different ocassions, the Japanese hinted their interest in peace negotiations through different channels. They contacted the British after the the Battle of Midway with a message from the Japanese foreign minister Togo. The message said that the Japanese was ready to be helpful if the British Government was willing to talk.(McManus 2) In the United States, Army chief of Staff George M arshall wanted to continue fighting and did not want to hear of any peace or surrender talks. He believed in a full-scale invasion of Japan. President Roosevelt was greatly influenced by George Marshall.(McManus 3) To talk about peace with Japan was a difficult matter. Because Japan was divided into two separate groups, it was important to come to a clear agreement to not give the war party any motives to overthrow the government and take the war farther than it should.(Howarth 216) In July 1945, after the Germans had been defeated, the Big Three, Winston Churchill, Josef Stalin and President Roosevelt got together in the Postdam Conference, they agreed with the decision of giving Japan unconditional surrender. The United States felt confident because, at that moment, they already had the atomic bomb.(Leckie 936)When the Japanese gave a negative response, the United States took it as a sign that the Japanese were not interested in peace and made plans its accordingly to cast one ato mic bomb on Hiroshima and one on Nagasaki.(Churchill 556) The main reason for this misunderstanding was because the Americans failed to see the importance of several cultural and political aspects of the Japanese. General Dwight Eisenhower, supreme commander of the Allied forces understood these aspects when he said:Japan was at that moment seeking some way to surrender with a minimum loss of faceIt wasnt necessary to hit them with that awful thing(atomic bomb).(Bloomfield 1) General MacArthur had already informed President Roosevelt in January of 1945 under what terms the Japanese were willing to surrender, but Roosevelt dismissed them because he had made up his mind to continue fighting.(McManus 5)The ultimatum given to the Japanese in Postdam did not specify what the position of the Emperor would be in the case of a surrender. This was not acceptable to the Japanese, who considered the Emperor as their god, the heart of the Japanese people and culture.(Long 2) Without actually sp ecifying it, the Postdam ultimatum did appear to be threatening to the Emperor:There must be eliminated for all time the authority and influence of those who have deceived and misled the people of Japan into embarking on world conquest and stern justice shall be melted out to all war criminals.(Postdam 2 pg. 1474-1476/Long 2) According to Henry Stimson, Secretary of War: Only the imperial authority would induce the unconquered Japanese armies in Southeast Asia, China and Manchuria to lay down their arms. (Leckie 94) U.S. official Robert Morris reported that after careful interrogation to Japanese prisoners that the Japanese would yield most readily if they were assured that they could keep Emperor Hirohito.(McManus 3) The Japanese maintained their political and cultural structure even after the bombings. For those who believe that the bombings brought on the immediate surrender of Japan, they are mistaken. On August 14, 1945, five days after the bombings, the Japanese had still not surrendered. According the Japanese politics, only the Japanese Cabinet could rule for surrender. It was not the Emperors place to interfere in politics. In order to surrender, the voting had to be unanimous. There were some members of the Cabinet that opposed surrender and believed that the Japanese could still win the war, such as Minister Anami. The Cabinet finally voted unanimously when the Emperor asked the Cabinet to accede to my wishes and forthwith accept the Allied reply.(Long 3) Minister Anami said, As a Japanese soldier, I must obey my soldier.(Long 3)The participation of the USSR in the war against Japan brought on serious implications and was a factor that pushed the United States to use the bombs. When President Roosevelt went to the Yalta Conference in February 1945, Germany was practically defeated. Roosevelt wanted to determine the USSRs participation in the war against Japan. Roosevelt did not have the support of the atomic bombs and was not sure exactly when he wo uld. Stalin agreed to fight against the Japanese under certain conditions. Stalin said that he wanted the territories that the Japanese had taken from the USSR during the Russo-Japanese War of 1904. Roosevelt and Churchill surprisingly agreed to give Stalin some rights over China without reporting this to China. Robert Sherwood said, If China had refused to agree to any of the Soviet claims, presumably the U.S. and Britain would have been compelled to join in enforcing them.(Leckie 847)Once the bomb was completed, the German army had capitulated, therefore, it was decided to use the bomb on Japan. Roosevelt decided, first, to invite the Japanese to attend an explosion of the bomb to convince them to surrender. This never happened because President Roosevelt died and the new president, Harry Truman had different plans.(Pirenne 432)President Truman had no clue the atomic bombs existed until he became president. He realized that with the bombs the Russian participation in the war again st the Japanese was unnecessary. While Truman attended the Postdam Conference in July , 1945, he learned about the successful test of the first atomic bomb. When Truman told Churcill about the bomb, Churchill said, The end of the Japanese War no longer depended upon the pouring in of their (the Russians armies)We had no need to ask favours of them.(Churchill 553) He then wrote to the British Foreign Secretary, It is quite clear that the United States do not at the present time desire Russian partcipation in the war against Japan.(Howarth 217) When Truman told Stalin about the bomb, he was very vague and he casually mentioned to Stalin that we had a new weapon of unusual destructive force.(Truman 416) Did this mean that he wanted the atomic bomb to be as much as a surprise to the Russians as to the Japanese? According to Blackett, the author of Fear, War, and the Bomb, President Truman wanted the bomb dropped before Stalin entered the war. Blackett states that US Secretary of State J ames F. Byrnes wrote in his diary that the Americans were most anxious to get the Japanese affair over with before the Russians got in.(Yew Teng 2) Blackett also mentions the diary entry of Walter Brown, an assistant to Byrnes, that suggests that Truman and Byrne considered the bomb as a way to reduce Soviet political influence in Asia. Brown noted that Truman was hoping for a quick surrender of Japan in order to stop the Russians from pressing any claims in China.(Yew Teng 2) A militarian historian, Basil Liddell Hart, wrote, President Truman and most of his chief adviserswere now as intent on using the atomic bomb to accelerate Japans collapse as Stalin was on entering the war against Japan before it ended, in order to gain an advantegeous position in the Far East.(Howarth 218) After Germanys defeat, Stalin took as much as he could in Eastern Europe. Stalin wanted to take part in the war against Japan to take parts of China and share in the occupation of Japan as the price of his participation.(Howarth 216) The decision to use the atomic bomb on the Japanese was simply spurred by the fact that the bombs were available. Initially, the bomb was built to use against the Germans. The Americans had reasons to fear that the Germans were building a bomb of their own. The bombs were completed after Germany was defeated. The attention of the Americans was focused on ending the war in Japan. The Manhattan Project, the project in charge of building the bombs, had already cost the United States over 1 billion dollars. It is estimated to have cost as much as all the scientific research previously conducted by mankind from the beginning of recorded time.(Howarth 204) People have asked themselves why the second atomic bomb was dropped on Nagasaki. The Hiroshima bomb was a uranium bomb and the Nagasaki bomb was a plutonium bomb. Did this mean that it was a scientific experiment.(Yew Teng 3) The decision to use the bomb on Japanese was easier than using it on Germans. First of all, Japan had directly attacked an American base, which created racist feelings in the Americans against the Japanese. According to journalist Coleman, few American soldiers that fought in Germany are sorry that they did not obliterate the Germans. On the other hand, most soldiers that fought against the Japanese there is an underlying anit-Japanese hatred that is visceral and strong. He also said wether the United States would have used it on a Bavarian city full of blonde-haired children is hard to tell. But precious little soul-searching went into the decisions to incinerate whole cities of Japanese. President Truman expressed his racist feelings openly. How do you account for the co existence of poverty EssayDannen, Gene. Harry S. Truman, Diary, July 25, 1945, availableemail: emailprotected 1995Enola Gay (aircraft), Infotrac, vers. Mac Computer Software, Information Access Incorp., 1995Howarth, Tony. 20th Century History: The World since 1900, Essex, Longman, 1983. Kazamek, Francis. Two handfuls of bone and ashes: teaching our children about Hiroshima, Infotrac:vers Mac ComputerSoftware, Information Access, Incorp. 1995. Leckie, Robert. Delivered from Evil: The Saga of World War II,New York, Harper and Row, 1987. Long, Doug. Hiroshima:Was it absolutely necessary?, Internet. McManus, John F.Why did the US unleash its terrible weapon? Appleton, 1995. InternetPirenne, Jacques. Historia Universal VIII, Mexico, Cumbre, 1976. Postdam versions. Available at WWW at: http://www.peak.org/danneng/decision/postdam.html InternetYew Teng, Fan. Truman and his A-bombs, Penang, Third World Network, 1993. NetscapeRESEARCH PAPER THESIS AND OUTLINEThesis statement: The reasons why the United States government used dropped the bombs on Japan are contrary to the history books versions. I. The atomic bomb was not used to make the Japanese surrendera. The Japanese were weakened by late 1944b. The Japanese had already tried to begin a peace talkc. The United States gave them unconditional surrenderII. The Postdam Conference and the Sovietsa. Truman was afraid of the Soviets interventionb. Truman kept the atomic bomb from Stalin but not from ChurchillIII. The U.S. was tired and wanted to end the war once and for alla. The Pacific war was particurlarly bloodyb. The U.S. held a racist feeling against the JapaneseBIBLIOGRAPHY: Truman Tells Stalin, July 24, 1945. Original document from NetScapeYew Teng, Fan. Truman and his A-Bombs. Third World Network. MalaysiaMcManus, John. Dropping the Bomb American Opinion Publishing, Appleton, WI 1995. Bloomfield, Janet. Why the atom bomb wasnt necessary to end the war. Campaign for Nuclear Disarment London, EnglandSzilard Petition Letter. U.S. National Archives folder #76A petition to the President of the United States. U.S. National Archives folder #76Howarth, Tony 20th Century History-The world since 1900 Longman House. Essex, England